Artest still available for Knicks?

KnicksAgent01 · by **KnicksAgent01** on Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:22 am

Link:If Ron Artest is still available the Knicks would likely have to come off their stance of David Lee and Renaldo Balkman as untouchables. The Kings nearly received Bulls star Ben Gordon in a three-team Artest/Kobe Bryant trade.

thekidd13 · by **thekidd13** on Fri Nov 02, 2007 4:29 pm

RON RON wouldent hurt our team....i wouldent mind the most scariest defender in NY....i mean we wont be a good defensive team like stat wise but sure would be good at stopping certain players

ClubKnicks · by **ClubKnicks** on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:16 pm

thekidd13 wrote:RON RON wouldent hurt our team....i wouldent mind the most scariest defender in NY....i mean we wont be a good defensive team like stat wise but sure would be good at stopping certain players

We need an impact player because from the looks of it this team doesn't have someone who wants to take lead when crunch time occurs. Ron would be a nice fit since he fears no one and have the attitude to strike fear on his opponents.

thekidd13 · by **thekidd13** on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:19 pm

we need u RON RON! 2 atleast slow down lebron!

The Next Knick · by **The Next Knick** on Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:01 am

If we got Artest too, DAMN, we would be beastin it up. Artest is a great ball player, I just want Nate to stay and Lee.

KnicksAgent01 · by **KnicksAgent01** on Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:05 pm

Curry
Randolph
Artest

Wow that front court would be LETHAL

Vash · by **Vash** on Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:23 pm

I doubt the Knicks are gonna trade for him at this point. We must really be having a crappy season for that to happen.

Hopefully he'll opt out at the end of the season and we can buy out Jerome James and Jared Jeffries in order to make room for Artest. We see how serious he is about playing in NY!

Knicks Always n Forever · by **Knicks Always n Forever** on Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:43 pm

right now the way we are playing, we dont really need him. Curry and Randolph are doing great together and I sseriously think we can make the playoffswithout Artest. I would love to get Artest but I dont see that happening

ClubKnicks · by **ClubKnicks** on Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:38 pm

Knicks Always n Forever wrote:right now the way we are playing, we dont really need him. Curry and Randolph are doing great together and I sseriously think we can make the playoffswithout Artest. I would love to get Artest but I dont see that happening

Lets get the Kings GM drunk and offer him Jeffries and Rose and I'm sure Artest will be wearing an orange and blue jersey in no time :man12:

Vash · by **Vash** on Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:18 am

ClubKnicks wrote:
Knicks Always n Forever wrote:right now the way we are playing, we dont really need him. Curry and Randolph are doing great together and I sseriously think we can make the playoffswithout Artest. I would love to get Artest but I dont see that happening

Lets get the Kings GM drunk and offer him Jeffries and Rose and I'm sure Artest will be wearing an orange and blue jersey in no time

Awesome if Kings GM goes for that but I would prefer to keep Rose and throw in Jerome James instead. Rose still has some use and James has yet to show that he can help us in any way.

Knicks Always n Forever · by **Knicks Always n Forever** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:13 pm

Yea because Rose has experience and rings. We need tht. Jeffries and James have nuttin

thekidd13 · by **thekidd13** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:34 pm

yea but i doubt the kings would take them...if i was them i wouldent

Artest still available for Knicks?

Artest still available for Knicks?

Who is online

More NBA Forums