| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thekidd13

Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 65 Location: Queens New York
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:50 pm Post subject: Knicksonline.com |
|
|
omg i joined the forum...and wow u know its more active than this 1 but like omg man...there like weird knick fans...i mean some suck off Lee all the time saying hes an all star and rather have him than Curry...i mean he scores 8.5 points per game! i mean yea he a spark of the bench but u guys know what happens when he starts...and like he aint a all star yet and he just a spark of the bench and alot of teams have that...like bulls and nochioni...idk man and well they HATE MARBURY AND ISIAH CRAWFORD AND RANDOLPH...they want 2 trade them and everything and keep the bench >_> wow i mean curry crawford and randolph were good with them...idk man but these guys making me hate Lee _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ClubKnicks Site Admin

Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 2563 Location: Heart of NY
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The forum is more active due to it being there longer than this one has. Plus its hard for a forum to remain active when one or two people are posting news topics and discussions. In other words, if you want to see progress everyone has to chip in. I apologize for being away due to having internet issues so I could not update anything but it's hard doing this alone. I ask once again, for help. Post news articles create discussions. The more it shows the better the results.
As for people jocking Lee. Lets see it like this. The man is a PF/SF and Curry is a Center. Curry is inside that lane more than Lee is yet Lee rebounds WAY better than him. Not to mention is one heck of a finisher when he's open in the lane. He hustles and never stops trying to give his all. His only lack of talent is to be a good mid range shooter. But that will come at hand with his work ethic because he always works hard at his game. Notice how bad he was at FT shooting. Now he's become much much better. Curry has not shown any improvement that makes me feel its a change.
I will not forget that 2 rebounds he only had in over 20+ mins of play.....
IF Eddy can't show me change than yes I agree that Lee is worth keeping over Curry. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vash ClubKnicks Moderator

Joined: 19 Sep 2006 Posts: 431
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I totally agree ClubKnicks! Im starting to believe that this is all that we are ever going to get from Curry. Its a shame but it looks like he is quite comfortable with the type of player that he is and is not willing to put in the extra work to change. He definitely would have benefitted from going to college. He needs someone to challenge him into getting better and that is not happening.
People like Lee because he does rebound. He also hustles. He doesn't have the skills that Curry has but he is trying to become a better player. As long as Curry is averaging less that 6/7 rebounds a game and less than 1 block shot per game then the knicks are not going to win with him at center. _________________ VASH
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thekidd13

Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 65 Location: Queens New York
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yea i know and thats true lee did get allot better in the free trow line... i always liked Lee but omg these people suck him off 2 much! i mean idk well look at eddy's offense gotten allot better because the coaches been working on that with him...i think if we get a defensive coach eddy can be much better defensively...and the hustle part well hey eddy isint exactly on a fit shape. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ClubKnicks Site Admin

Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 2563 Location: Heart of NY
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once Curry can establish himself as a better defender and rebounder he will be a force. Right now he's just a offensive man which is ok, but a man at his size needs to put fear in the eyes of the slashers. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|